Messages posted by bredo

martin.jirsak wrote:The only one idea, I have, is to try to trash (or better way: rename) preferences of Studio One.

Thanks.
Will certainly try, but I thought I could leave this behind in the Cubendo camp

I get the message box which says: Do you want to revert to the ...... called bredo.
I'm clicking yes, but it won't.
When I try to change to the Cubase one, I can see the name change before the message bos appears. Not so when I try to import my own.
This has always worked fine???????

I have exported and backed up my Key Commands for Studio One 2.5, but now it won't import.
Anyone else?

Any Ideas?

Are there a way to zoom vertically only the selected track/tracks?
With a Key Command that is.

1. Import Session Data
2. An inch or so taller faders in the mixer (maybe as an option?)
3. The ability to update track/mixer groups (without deletig and making a new one).

When loop recording, all takes are essentially one long audio file.
The events in the different layers/takes just reference different parts of the same audio file.

Are there not Thunderbolt to Firewire adapters/converters out there? Maybe not yet?
Far to much Firewire equipment out there to be ignored IMO.

Isn't thare a "Tapestyle" monitoring mode in S1?

Input signal in stop and record, playback from "tape" in play mode. That should do it

I agree on all of the above

But one thing missing in Studio One is a form of "Import Session Data" feature from PT (very powerful).
Maybe in v3?

It is the top most feature missing to make me do a permanent change to Studio One.
Really hoping for this.

Is there set a date for the Capture 2 release yet?

hj-roser wrote:Read between the lines... In nearly no case I would record my own band in 88.2 or 96 K. But if a payer wants to record in 96 I want to be able to do it...

100% agree. I don't necessary need 96 K, but some paying customers may want it.

But most people see this things from a hobbyist perspective (as in not having paying clients).
Without the 96 K option the StudioLive mixers resides more to the Live side than the Studio side IMO.
We all have different needs and reasons for wanting different features and specs.

So please be friends

In Europe it's the EBU that have set -23 LUFS as the target level, through the EBU R-128 standard.

http://tech.ebu.ch/Jahia/site/tech/cache/offonce/pid/1;jsessionid=C101853CF7708E8BA266A18DC206DA5B.jahia1

There's a lot to read up on, if interested

This is a delivery standard for audio related to broadcasting, not a mixing standard as many seems to think.
But the closer you are to the target, the less volume/loudness manipulation the broadcasters do to our mixes (when doing music production). The equipement will be installed on their side.
So if your mixes/music may end up on TV, radio, internet when ISP's adapt the standard and other streaming services follow, you can as well leave some headroom in your music.

That said, if a mix/master by todays standard are to be "loudness normalized" due to the new standard it will sound pretty limited and lifeless compared to mixes that have taken the advantage of the headroom allowed in the new set of rules.
No more chopped off transients in our mixes

When we first are at it, what a hell:

http://vimeo.com/3800672

A bit old video, and he is in Pro Tools HD. But from PT9 and onward it has full Import Session Data also in the native version.

Then take a look here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zeNj9TxKIlo

All videos show slightly different uses of Import Session Data. Very powerful feature indeed.