Joined: 21/11/2012 01:42:35
Messages: 579
Location: Seattle, WA., USA
Offline
I like this. The 1st one is best.
The "More Dynamics" is too quiet.
I'm not in the camp of using max compression to get sky-high volumes but I'm some where in the middle... believing that a moderate amount of compression is good.
ASUS G75VX, i7 3820QM, 16GB Ram, 2 Samsung 840 256GB SSD's; Win8.1 64; Thunderbolt-Firewire 800 converter (TI chipset).
S1P 2.6.1; PreSonus FP10; EZdrummer 2.0.1, 64; Alchemy 1.55 64. Melodyne Editor 64 - 2.1.2; Izotope Alloy 2 & Ozone 5.
Carvin, ESP, Ibanez, Martin & Yamaha guitars.
Roland Fantom S; Rode NT1; SM58. Line 6 POD HD500 & POD XT-Live. BBE 422A; KRK Rokit 8 Powered Studio Monitors.
Band site: https://soundcloud.com/2guyzinabasement
scottyo7 wrote:I like this. The 1st one is best.
The "More Dynamics" is too quiet.
I'm not in the camp of using max compression to get sky-high volumes but I'm some where in the middle... believing that a moderate amount of compression is good.
Joined: 27/01/2011 23:35:24
Messages: 23
Location: South East
Offline
I prefer the first mix, the second sounds overly compressed to me, but that's just my opinion.
BC
HARD/SORFTWARE: S1-2, Firestudio Mobile, Fader Port, Boss GT-100, TC Helicon VoiceLive Extreme, Krank Rev Half Stack, Genz Benz 2x12 Stereo Cab, BC Rich Pro X Mockingbird, Dean Split Tail, MXL V-69, Sure SM 58
MORE AT: aberrantlabel.com
facebook.com/aberrantlabel
patreon.com/aberrantlabel
youtube.com/aberrantlabel
soundcloud.com/bc-solo
caraviel wrote:I prefer the first mix, the second sounds overly compressed to me, but that's just my opinion.
Thanks for listening and commenting.
Indeed the other one has more dynamics , original tone and characteristics as well more focused separation of tone between
the more transparent sound sources and the artificial processed ones.
Somewhere in space as said by the Equaliser:
"Strange lines like this makes the pieces in the maze
think that they aren't following the pattern."